Obama Considers Halting All Home Foreclosures! Too Little too late again!


Now why didn’t bungling Obama do this before & also fund it with some of the “Stimulus Money” ?
Contrary to popular belief, even after the CASH FOR CLUNKERS that many took part in, including some that should not have participated. There is still quite a lot of that cash that has not been distributed and should be returned to the Treasury! But “Consideration of Halting All Foreclosures” ? If he has the power to do so, he already let many individuals down. I don’t mean the ones that bought a very expensive home for the sake of owning a very expensive home knowing that they could not eventually afford it, but the frugal ones were/are trying to live the “American Dream” if you will & have the rug pulled from under them because of the market conditions, etc. etc. Not to make government larger either because the programs have been in place with Fannie & Freddie for years.
We all know Bo, Barry, Barrack or whatever you call yourself! You are a one term president and it is up to the Senate & Congress to minimize the damage that you have done & still will or could do!
Where do you get off all of a sudden pulling a stunt like this when you could have saved so many from this upheaval? No folks, it didn’t happen to this writer, but it still steams me that he chooses to close the barn door after the horse is out and try to grandstand. Just more spending & too little too late! But hey, that’s Bo!
Story below…..

Obama Considers Halting All Home Foreclosures
Friday, 26 Feb 2010
By: Frank McGuire

President Barack Obama reportedly is considering stopping all home foreclosures unless they have been rejected by the administration’s struggling $75 billion mortgage assistance program.

The move comes as Republicans take aim at Obama’s mortgage assistance program. Republicans argue the effort is making the economic crisis worse and say many homeowners would be better off as renters.

The president has been trying to convince investors and the general public that the country is slowly emerging from the recession, but the threat of foreclosures and a faltering housing recovery has been looming over the economy.

Meg Reilly, a Treasury Department spokeswoman, told Bloomberg that the proposed foreclosure ban was “one of the many ideas under consideration” in Obama’s attempt to stabilize the housing market.

“This proposal has not been approved and there are no immediate planned announcements on the issue,” she wrote in an e-mail. She confirmed the authenticity of the plan, which hasn’t been made public, Bloomberg reported.

Right now, lenders can initiate foreclosure proceedings on any loan that hasn’t been submitted for Home Affordable Modification Program, or HAMP, eligibility. Under current rules, foreclosure litigation can proceed while borrowers are under review for the program or even in a trial modification.

The proposed changes would prohibit lenders from initiating new foreclosure actions before loan screening by HAMP and would require lenders to halt existing proceedings for borrowers once they are in a trial repayment plan, Bloomberg reported.

Meanwhile, Reps. Darrell Issa, R-Calif. and Jim Jordan, R-Ohio., on Thursday called the program a misuse of taxpayer money, The Associated Press reported. Though $75 billion has been set aside for the program, so far only $15 million has been spent.

The lawmakers also said Obama’s plan distorts the housing market by keeping people in their homes who would be better off going through foreclosure.

Homeowners who enroll in the program but then drop out “would have been better off if they had defaulted earlier and spent the payments on more affordable housing options,” the two lawmakers wrote.

Obama administration officials, however, reject that argument. They say the program gives a second chance to homeowners who were given shoddy loans during the housing boom.

And they defend their track record, even though only 116,000 homeowners have completed the process out of the 1 million enrolled since the program’s launch last March.

Earlier this week, Freddie Mac, which has lost a total of almost $80 billion since the housing crisis started in 2007, said a record 4 percent of its borrowers are at least three months behind on their payments and facing foreclosure.

Freddie Mac Chief Executive Charles Haldeman warned a “potential large wave of foreclosures” may sweep the nation.

The faltering housing recovery and threat of foreclosures are major problems for the federal government, which seized control of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in September 2008. The two companies have already siphoned $111 billion from the government to stay afloat. That number is expected to hit $188 billion by fall 2011.

Meanwhile, the Obama administration reportedly also is considering forcing lenders to make principal reductions to help struggling homeowners.

Asked about the possibility of using principal reductions on mortgages to stem the tide of foreclosures, Phyllis Caldwell, chief of the Treasury’s Homeownership Preservation Office, said the department was open to the idea, Reuters reported.

“Our office has been aggressively considering proposals on all areas that we can do to address the foreclosure crisis in this country,” Caldwell told lawmakers on the House Oversight and Government Reform Domestic Policy Subcommittee.

Post Office bailout on the table? Our pockets are not as deep as yours Bo! Or as you were called years ago….BARRY!


A Postal Service spokesman tells CBS News that the agency currently owes the U.S. Treasury $10.2 billion. Now comes word that Congressman Danny Davis (D-Illinios) is calling for a federal bailout of the Postal Service and elimination of Saturday service.
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=778402 ….more

What else do taxpayers have to pay for 3 different ways? We already pay high postage rates, taxes & now a bailout? NO Way!
That’s THREE different ways we’re putting money into the Postal Service. THREE WAYS & now all THREE are going to increase all three !
The Postal Sevice owes the U.S. Treasury over TEN BILLION DOLLARS.