H.R. 3200 … The Downfall of America

This an absolute disgrace that elected officials of the United States would stoop
down to the levels they have already, yet to even lower depths by passing this ridiculous bill H.R. 3200. You expect the American People to say it’s okay with us for you to decide when the appropriate “DOLLAR” amount is reach per year in our heatlhcare (rationing) , as in 5,000 to 10.000 dollars per year ? No way will we stand for this, and as for putting the decision in the dictatorship’s hands as the time to die? You are all bigger idiots than we I thought you were! Obama, Pelosi, Reid are the authors of the aborition & need to be dealt with in November. Unfortunately Bo will be a bit longer unless people have the guts to get Impeachment proceedings started. There are many grounds for it, Andrew Johnson’s impeachment charges were not as serious as what Bo is doing
and they in fact impeached him. Bill Clinton’s impeachment process was for less, yet it still happened. American Government is broken & it needs to be fixed by the American People with electing new faces that will serve us. NOT themselves

You wil ALL be out and the bill will be repealed for this is not Democracy.
This has turned into a dictatorshp and the revolution has begun! Look around you
are all of you too blind to see this? If so proceed at you own political risk for this writer’ s sentiments are not the view of only a few.

The link for the pdf file of the bill from the house,gov address is below.

cc: whitehouse;Nancy Pelosi; Harry Reid; Senator Lindsay Graham; Senator Bakkus;Senator Spector



Mr. President and I use that term loosely! You MUST listen to the people & abide by The Constitution of THE UNITED STATES. It does matter what WE want & not
what you wish!
Disregard for the Constitution is grounds for Impeachment, Andrew Johnson’s
Impeachment had a lot of similarities to what should be done to you & your entire administration tossed on its ear.

Obama czar’s shocking communist connections

Not really shocking for those of us who knew and those that had suspicions!
Another reason for impeachment… How many do you need? They only needed one
for Clinton! Obama’s ties with some of are these are friends. The ones THAT CAN BE DENIED present the case for this implementation. Prior administrations thoroughly checked out any appointments to the President’s Staff. Now Bo, that a whole different story. We can’t tell where he was truthfully born or if he is a TRUE U.S. Citizen. (Another reason)

The previous Impeachment article referred to McCarthy, Sen. Joseph McCarthy & the McCarthy era.

We don’t need a witch hunt, but we do need to have some organized structure of addressing this problem of Communism infiltrating our government.

Communism is a social structure in which classes are abolished and property is commonly controlled, as well as a political philosophy and social movement that advocates and aims to create such a society.

Karl Marx, the father of communist thought, posited that communism would be the final stage in society, which would be achieved through a proletarian revolution and only possible after a socialist stage develops the productive forces, leading to a superabundance of goods and services

As a political ideology, communism is usually considered to be a branch of socialism; a broad group of economic and political philosophies that draw on the various political and intellectual movements with origins in the work of theorists of the Industrial Revolution and the French Revolution

Communism attempts to offer an alternative to the problems with the capitalist market economy and the legacy of imperialism and nationalism.

See the story @ http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=126872

The Case for Impeachment

This site has it laid out (below) pretty well, but…..you know there had to be a but! When a President willfully degrades the United States continuously amongst other heads of state & appoints to his cabinet with full knowledge that people such as himself are Socialists & Marxists. That is a Treason! Look at the witch hunt McCarthy orchestrated back in the 50’s. For the ones unaware look him it up!
I’m not condoning a witch hunt…(but should I? hmmm…) at this point just merely stating that neither house years ago as well as the American People would put up with any of this garbage.
Another thing is that we’re not 100% sure this guy is even a U. S. citizen in the qualification sense of holding the Office, nor has it ever been willfully provided. (Something to hide Bo?)
The dual citizen doesn’t qualify him, which is the latest story leaking from that big ole
white building on PennsylvaniavAve. It won’t be the White House to this writer until
some is in there that is worthy of being called Mr. President.

This needs to be added to the LIST BELOW.

The Case For Impeachment
Why Obama Should Be Impeached

Obama swore to uphold the constitution.

It is unconstitutional to force people to buy anything ( Health Care ) from others.

It is unconstitutional to dictate what health care procedures are allowable.

It is unconstitutional to hard wire our bank accounts to the IRS and take our money without due process.

It is unconstitutional to appoint Czars that are not answerable to congressional oversight.

It is unconstitutional to fund organizations that further his election funded with taxes.

It is unconstitutional to give away US sovereignty to the UN.

It is unconstitutional to own parts of businesses.

It is unconstitutional to dictate salaries in the private sector.

Obama has done all of the above: All are violations of the constitution and high crimes.

Obam’s vote has allowed live babies to die after they are born.

Obama tried to bring the Census into the White House so he could rig it.

He wants to set up a national youth corps answerable to him.

Obama’s health care is systematically trying to reduce the life spans of Millions of old people by:

Cutting Medicare,
Reducing Early Cancer Detection,
Taxing Wheelchairs, Pacemakers, Heart Valves, Other Medical Devices,
Cutting Nursing Homes,
Cutting In Home Health Care,
Refusing Life Saving Treatment With No Appeal
Instituting Coercive End Of Life Panels

All to save money and buy votes ( of those now here illegally that he will try to legalize in 2010 ) to maintain permanent power.

Obama is a tyrant that will enslave the young, kill off the old, and in effect reduce the entire United States to one large forced labor camp/holding pen where one’s life is only valuable to the degree they can be taxed or bought off to vote to keep them in power. We are not cattle waiting for the slaughter.


White House to push ACORN pet project The Never Ending SOCIALISM is sickening

Remember Obama participated in socialist political group. He participated in a controversial 1990s political party with a socialist agenda, recalls a major member of the organization known as the New Party.
Now we will have to continue to fight this agenda. Shame on you Joe Biden for being a part of this!
Trying to change our structure of government to endearing Socialism should be grounds for Impeachment.
Read below…..

Critics warn plan will ‘sneak socialism’ into U.S., cause major economic lossPosted: February 28, 2010
10:19 pm Eastern

By Aaron Klein
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

The White House is considering a new policy that would give an advantage in bids for billions in government contracts to companies that pay workers “living wages” and offer generous benefits.

WND has learned the “living wage” campaign has long been pushed by the radical Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN, and was largely initiated on a local level in the 1990s with the help of a socialist party of which evidence suggests Barack Obama was a member.

Critics warn a living wage advantage for more than $500 billion in government contracts could harm small companies, with case studies showing cities that enacted similar policies in the 1990s faced major financial losses. Business groups who oppose the plan say also it would increase government procurement costs.

The Associated Press obtained documents outlining the White House plan. The documents reportedly show the government would examine the wages and benefits – such as health insurance, retirement benefits and paid leave – a firm pays its employees as a factor in the process of awarding government contracts. Another factor would be whether a contract bidder is a repeat violator of labor and employment laws.

A Labor Department compliance office would compile a score on contract bidders based on the criteria and then determine which companies would get government contracts.

Writing about a similar policy that was being considered in Chicago in 2003, Steven Malanga of the City Journal stated the movement “sneaks socialism into cities.”

Malanga notes the living wage movement got its start in mid-1990s Baltimore, when a coalition of left-leaning church leaders, unionists and community activists largely led by ACORN began to push for a “social compact” that included a hike in the minimum wage to $6.10 – 43 percent above the federal minimum wage at the time – for service workers in hotels and other businesses in the city’s redeveloped Inner Harbor, a prime tourist area.

Baltimore’s then-mayor Kurt Schmoke eventually signed a compromise bill that guaranteed the new $6.10 minimum for workers at any companies contracting with the city. Supporters hailed the increase as a costless victory for low-income workers.

But Baltimore’s economy soon crashed, with 58,000 jobs disappearing, even as the rest of Maryland added 120,000 jobs and other cities across the country prospered.

“The living wage bill was just one expression of a fiercely anti-business climate that helped precipitate Baltimore’s economic collapse,” wrote Malanga.

Another locale that enacted a living wage bill soon to see its economy burn was Milwaukee County in Wisconsin, which passed a law increasing the minimum wage only for city-contracted janitors and security guards to $6.25 an hour.

That law was urged on by ACORN and the socialist New Party, which was also instrumental in lobby efforts in Baltimore. The living wage campaign was a main platform of the New Party.

The New Party sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a socialist agenda.

The New Party, established in 1992, took advantage of what was known as electoral “fusion,” which enabled candidates to run on two tickets simultaneously, attracting voters from both parties. But the New Party went defunct in 1998, one year after fusion was halted by the Supreme Court.

The New Party worked closely with ACORN to promote its candidates. ACORN, convicted in massive, nationwide voter fraud cases, was a point of controversy for Obama during his campaign for president.

In August, a former top member of the New Party recounted in a WND e-mail interview Obama’s participation with his organization.

“A subcommittee met with (Obama) to interview him to see if his stand on the living wage and similar reforms was the same as ours,” recalled Marxist activist Carl Davidson.

“We determined that our views on these overlapped, and we could endorse his campaign in the Democratic Party,” Davidson said.

Davidson was a Chicago member and activist within the New Party. He told WND he handled some of the New Party member databases and attending most of the party’s meetings.

Davidson is also a notorious far-left activist and former radical national leader in the anti-Vietnam War movement. He served as national secretary for the infamous Students of a Democratic Society anti-war group, from which the Weather Underground domestic terrorist organization later splintered.

Davidson remembers Obama attending a New Party meeting to thank attendees for voting for him.

Davidson said that to his knowledge Obama was not a member of the New Party “in any practical way” – using qualifying language.

Becoming a New Party member requires some effort on behalf of the politician. Candidates must be approved by the party’s political committee and, once approved, must sign a contract mandating they will have a “visible and active relationship” with the party.

Asked whether Obama signed the New Party contract, Davidson replied there was “no need for him to do so.”

“At the end of our session with him, we simply affirmed there was no need to do so, because on all the key points, the stand of his campaign and the New Party reform planks were practically the same,” Davidson told WND.

Davidson denied the New Party was specifically a socialist party, claiming, “The vast majority of active members were low- and middle-income blacks in the inner city fighting for their immediate demands.”

But the socialist-oriented goals of the New Party were enumerated on its old website.

Among the New Party’s stated objectives were “full employment, a shorter work week and a guaranteed minimum income for all adults; a universal ‘social wage’ to include such basic benefits as health care, child care, vacation time and lifelong access to education and training; a systematic phase-in of comparable worth and like programs to ensure gender equity.”

The New Party stated it also sought “the democratization of our banking and financial system – including popular election of those charged with public stewardship of our banking system, worker-owner control over their pension assets [and] community-controlled alternative financial institutions.”

Many of the New Party’s founding members were Democratic Socialists of America leaders and members of Committees of Correspondence, a breakaway of the Communist Party USA.

Obama attended several DSA events and meetings, including a DSA-sponsored town hall meeting Feb. 25, 1996, entitled “Employment and Survival in Urban America.” He sought and received an endorsement from the DSA.

Asked by WND whether he thinks Obama has socialist leanings, Davidson stated, “The truth is that Obama was and is a liberal Democrat and an Alinskyist community organizer – which if you know much about Alinsky, is just militant liberalism.”

“Obama was never a man of the left, either in his views or in being a member of an actual socialist organization,” added Davidson.

While running for the Illinois state Senate in 1996 as a Democrat, Obama actively sought and received the endorsement of the New Party, according to confirmed reports during the 2008 presidential campaign.

Among New Party members was linguist and radical activist Noam Chomsky.

Obama listed as socialist party member

Obama’s campaign in 2008 denied the then–presidential candidate was ever an actual member of the New Party.

But the New Zeal blog dug up print copies of the New Party News, the party’s official newspaper, which show Obama posing with New Party leaders, listing him as a New Party member and printing quotes from him as a member.

The Party’s spring 1996 newspaper boasted: “New Party members won three other primaries this Spring in Chicago: Barack Obama (State Senate), Michael Chandler (Democratic Party Committee) and Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary).”

The paper quoted Obama saying, “These victories prove that small ‘d’ democracy can work.”

The newspaper lists other politicians it endorsed who were not members but specifies Obama as a New Party member.

New Ground, the newsletter of Chicago’s Democratic Socialists of America, reported in its July/August 1996 edition that Obama attended a New Party membership meeting April 11, 1996, in which he expressed his gratitude for the group’s support and “encouraged NPers (New Party members) to join in his task forces on voter education and voter registration.”

With additional research by Brenda J. Elliott